<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Problem Solving &#8211; WorkAsOne.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.workasone.com/category/problem-solving/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.workasone.com</link>
	<description>Technology and Working Together</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 May 2017 00:42:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>McKinsey&#8217;s MECE</title>
		<link>https://www.workasone.com/best-practices/mckinseys-mece/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Samir]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 07:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Problem Solving]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workasone.wordpress.com/?p=271</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Forgive me if I'm stating something obvious.  I'm just surprised how often I see people (in all kinds of situations) make recommendations without providing any rationale behind their recommendations.  IMHO, this makes recommendations, and all the hard work and thought that went into them, virtually meaningless.  Always frame the problem first and start with the  [...]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
